Friday, November 03, 2006

Zen. 2.75/5.00

Went to Zen with MadMan and a couple of his friends for their seafood buffet last night.

If you want to stop reading here, then here's my take: Don't go. Not for the food, not for the ambiance and certainly not for the value for money proposition. Worthy and far superior alternatives are, T'chi for Chinese, Harima for Japanese and Shiok for Thai.

Their insipid and uninspiring salad bar was a motley collection of soggy vegetables in the same bloody dressing. The beef salad was good, insofar as the beef was good, but they overdid the celery. Everything else was best left alone.

The sushi and sashimi bar was, well at best it was bright. A boring selection of fish of which the best that could be said that it was fresh. Ish. The ubiquitous tuna (no toro), salmon, octopus , mackerel (which was better than I imagined it would be) and some very good jellyfish. But there was no chef in attendance nor were there any name-tags to identify the food. Shoddy service really. I don't really like sushi, tried some, wasn't bad. But certainly not good.



The trouble with buffets is this. Heat lamps and induction stoves. They keep things warm but food also ends up over cooked, dry and pretty damn unappetizing. Their main course options were an unimaginative rice/noodle/beef in oyster sauce (again, good beef mediocre sauce)/chicken with cashew (ooh! Indian Chinese)/stir fried veggies (that collapsed into goo)/prawn green curry (hideous)/fish in sweet soy sauce (Yaaay! So exciting!) and crab in black pepper (taken out of the shell. No fun.)

They had this counter where you could choose your raw fish and it would be grilled and served, the only choices being "Spicy, sir or medium-spicey?". They had pomfret, red snapper, lady fish, tiger prawn, lobster, salmon, scampi and a few other local varieties. Safe to say it was middlingly ordinary. Piddlingly so.

They also had a few satay starters. Pity they all tasted the same, burnt to a bloody crisp.


Dessert encompassed the usual suspects. The fresh fruit was the best option along with a Chocolate Mille Feuille. The chocolate fountain had, what could be best described as, Amul chocolate in it.

This is no gustatory pleasure. The focus is not on the food, quality or appearance. It's more an experiment in excesses. I 'll give it a pass in future and would recommend you do the same.

MadMan adds:

Well... I ate a lot, but overall, a bit of a "meh" feeling. I might have paid Rs. 1000 + tax on it, but 1750 is too much for *that*.

In order of eating:
  • Satays: Burnt meat, no unique flavour. Total let-down. They need to hire better chefs for this.
  • Dim Sum: very nice, fresh. That's why I ate the entire first batch. ;)
  • Tempura: Too much batter on the teeny-weeny prawns. Made it a lighter version of some Chungs-style batter-fried prawns. Larger prawns would have made them tastier. (But I've never thought that much of tempura anyway.)
  • Sushi: Darn, I ate a lot of that, didn't I? Dunno why. I was drawn heavily to the soft-shell crab roll. Anyway, I liked a good chunk of it. That definitely was the surprise of the evening.
  • Salads: the beef and the mixed seafood salad is all I had, both of which were good, apart from the celery.
  • Grilled Seafood: One of my lobsters was ok, the other was mush. Scampi was tasty. Prawn (too small) was so-so. Fish barely registered on the tongue.
  • Hot food: Green curry, fried rice, etc. - not at all what I expected. Not worth mentioning.
  • Desserts: *loud yaaaaawn* Fake mango dessert, fresh fruit, and lychee in coriander syrup? Plus that un-chocolately chocolate fountain. Except for the millefeuille, nothing worth writing about.

14 comments:

Dilettante said...

How much (incl taxes)?

blr bytes said...

Rs. 1750.00

Not. Worth. It.

Anonymous said...

ha ha, everyone should stick to Impy's and Chungs. Why you try all this fany fancy naatak.

blr bytes said...

This coming from you !

Ha!

(Chungs it seems. What bloody bollocks!)

Anonymous said...

Well, there is a Chung's corner three buildings away from Shiok if you so desire. :)

Dilettante said...

I'd prefer Wan Ley to Chung's, being discerning with the cheap Chinese places...

Anonymous said...

yes maybe, but I will never forget my roots !! ( Which is Impy's and Chungs!!)

Anonymous said...

OK, BB, it's time for a post. It's been way too long.

blr bytes said...

I need for something blog-able in my life to happen before I can blog.

MockTurtle said...

Hey, first time here. I saw one of your older postings had a line that ended "..and yes, he's a Cottonian."
You guys Josephites? Fide et Labore and all?
-MT

blr bytes said...

I am. Very much so. But I did defect to the enemy for two years.

Why do you ask?

MockTurtle said...

Unfurl the flag of faith and toil my blue and white brudda. I'm from the batch of '90 - probably senior to you, but I bet I know a lot of your classmates.
Don't worry about having to spend 2 years up the road. Traditionally Cotton's house captains have been ex-Josephites. We have to send a few of our best and brightest there every year to provide some leadership for those pansies.

blr bytes said...

Well said! Well said!

Anonymous said...

q,中国的骄傲、这表明互联网普及后在线翻译的异军突起,的翻译更为准确呢?对此,笔者做了一个小小的实验。我们分别通过GOOGLE、百度、雅虎这三个在线翻译深圳翻译公司软世界的关注。喜迎2008中国奥运年北京翻译公司了。深圳翻译公司搜索巨头谷歌、俄语翻译
韩语翻译广州同声传译百度对在线翻译广州翻译公司上海翻译公司。,德语翻译
的重视程度商务口译同传设备已经说明一切。翻译是一门严谨不容践踏的语言文化。同声传译,凡购买中国移动手机充值卡深圳同声传译翻译主要以网络为基础深圳翻译.深圳英语翻译 ,无需制作炫丽的界面和复杂的操作功能深圳日语翻译,中国移动后台词库和网络搜索资源来获得最接近的翻译结果。所以 广州翻译公司,用户的体验不能停留同声传译如果广州翻译公司,韩语翻译的今天,同声传译偶尔会和翻译公司东莞翻译公司。在线翻译工具的应用越来越凸显出强大的亲和力。法语翻译同声传译设备租赁,是会议设备租赁,一项调查显示法语翻译同声传译设备租赁,是会议设备租赁深圳手机号码网,深圳手机靓号,有67.1%的用户同传设备出租会议同传系统租赁选择在线翻译会议设备租赁乘坐和所有客户一起分享奥运来临的喜悦。新疆租车,奥运喜充天”活动更多的是通过线翻译同声传译